{"id":342,"date":"2010-12-02T13:21:15","date_gmt":"2010-12-02T12:21:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.matjazev.net\/blog\/?p=342"},"modified":"2010-12-28T07:57:47","modified_gmt":"2010-12-28T06:57:47","slug":"kako-je-predstavljen-cas-v-excelu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.matjazev.net\/blog\/2010\/12\/02\/kako-je-predstavljen-cas-v-excelu\/","title":{"rendered":"Kako je predstavljen \u010das v Excelu?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Zadnji\u010d smo si ogledali, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.matjazev.net\/blog\/2010\/12\/02\/datumi-v-excelu\/\">kako Excel vidi datume<\/a>. Kaj pa \u010dase, kako vidi slednje?<\/p>\n<p>\u010ce malce premislimo (tako kot so to naredili tudi avtorji Excela) lahko hitro pridemo do ugotovitve, da je \u010das samo neka podenota datuma. \u010cas delimo na ure, minute in sekunde (no lahko tudi podrobneje a to sedaj ni pomembno), a hkrati \u010das sestavlja tudi datum. 24 ur skupaj namre\u010d predstavlja 1 dan.<\/p>\n<p>In \u010de smo zadnji\u010d uvideli, da Excel vidi datume kot naravna \u0161tevila, torej 1 je 1 dan lahko potegnemo preprost sklep, da je tudi 24 ur 1 dan <strong>oz 24 ur je v Excelu \u0161tevilo 1. Torej je 12 ur ena polovica oz 0,5\u2026 <\/strong>In to razmi\u0161ljanje nas pripelje do edini mo\u017ene razlage, da je \u010das v Excelu predstavljen kot realno \u0161tevilo.<\/p>\n<h3>Kako torej Excel vidi \u010das?<\/h3>\n<p><pre>\u010clovek&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Excel\n24 ur&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1 = 1 dan\n12 ur&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0,5&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (= 12\/ 24)\n 6 ur&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0,25&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(=&nbsp;&nbsp;6\/ 24)\n 2 uri&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;0,083333333&nbsp;&nbsp; (=&nbsp;&nbsp;2\/ 24)\n15 minut&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;0,010416667&nbsp;&nbsp; (= 15\/(24*60))\n 2 minuti&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0,001388889&nbsp;&nbsp; (=&nbsp;&nbsp;2\/(24*60))\n15 sekund&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0,000173611&nbsp;&nbsp; (= 15\/(24*60*60))\n 1 sekunda&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;0,000011574&nbsp;&nbsp; (=&nbsp;&nbsp;1\/(24*60*60))\n<\/pre><\/p>\n<h3>Pa \u0161e malce &#8220;te\u017eje&#8221;<\/h3>\n<p>Koliko je v Excelu 2 uri 15 minut in 32 sekund? \u010ce to najprej pretvorimo v sekunde,  dobimo<br \/>\n<pre>2h 15m 32s = (2*60*60) + (15*60) + 32 = 8132\n<\/pre><br \/>\nIn \u010de sekunde pretvorimo v Excelov \u010das, dobimo:<br \/>\n<pre>8132 \/ (24*60*60) = 0,09412037\n<\/pre><\/p>\n<h3>Ali je to res?<\/h3>\n<p>Preizkus je trivialen. V Excelovo celico vpi\u0161ite &#8216;2:15:32&#8217; in celico oblikujte kot \u0161tevilo\u2026 <strong>Dobili ste 0,09412037 \ud83d\ude42<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Zadnji\u010d smo si ogledali, kako Excel vidi datume. Kaj pa \u010dase, kako vidi slednje? \u010ce malce premislimo (tako kot so to naredili tudi avtorji Excela) lahko hitro pridemo do ugotovitve, da je \u010das samo neka podenota datuma. \u010cas delimo na ure, minute in sekunde (no lahko tudi podrobneje a to sedaj ni pomembno), a hkrati &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.matjazev.net\/blog\/2010\/12\/02\/kako-je-predstavljen-cas-v-excelu\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Kako je predstavljen \u010das v Excelu?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,3,19],"tags":[32,14,61,30],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.matjazev.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.matjazev.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.matjazev.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.matjazev.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.matjazev.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=342"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.matjazev.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":435,"href":"https:\/\/www.matjazev.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342\/revisions\/435"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.matjazev.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=342"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.matjazev.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=342"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.matjazev.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=342"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}